The Deadline Plate is a student journalism time-travel mystery about four young reporters who discover an old printing plate in their school’s anniversary time capsule. When the plate pulls them into 1887 New York, they must work with Nellie Bly as her groundbreaking asylum investigation is threatened by a mysterious force trying to erase the record. To get home, they have to protect sources, preserve evidence, and learn that telling the truth means more than getting the story first.
Why My Time Travelers Carry Notebooks
When I decided to send four student journalists into 1887 New York, I
gave them the obvious modern tools: phones, cameras, audio recorders,
and the instinct to document everything. Then I made those tools
unreliable.
That choice became one of the engines of The Deadline Plate, the first
book in The Chronicle Keepers series.
The novel begins with four students discovering a printing plate
buried in their school's time capsule. The plate carries a story about
their own disappearance and sends them to New York during Nellie Bly's
early reporting career.
Someone called the Redactor is changing the
historical record. The students cannot simply look up what happened,
record a confession, or trust that a digital file will survive. They
have to interview witnesses, compare accounts, preserve documents, and
decide what they can prove.
In other words, they have to do journalism.
I teach high school journalism, newspaper, broadcast journalism, and
yearbook. My students live in a world where nearly every moment can be
photographed, recorded, copied, reposted, and misunderstood before the
bell rings. Their problem is rarely a lack of information. It is
figuring out which information deserves trust.
That made time travel an interesting writing problem. If my characters
could carry perfect access to the present into the past, the mystery
would collapse. A smartphone can become a shortcut disguised as a
prop. Search the name. Photograph the document. Record the witness.
Check the date. Done.
But journalism is not supposed to be a shortcut.
So the past pushes back. Batteries fail. Recordings cannot be trusted.
Context disappears. The students discover that having a copy of
something is not the same as understanding it. A document can be
authentic and still incomplete. A witness can tell the truth and still
be wrong. A newspaper can print accurate facts and create a false
impression through what it leaves out.
That last problem matters to me. My nonfiction work uses a framework
called the WATER Check: Words, Authority, Trace the claim, Evidence,
and Reaction. It teaches students to slow down before accepting or
sharing something. The framework grew from a classroom deception in
which every fact I presented was technically true, but the overall
conclusion was designed to mislead.
The same idea sits underneath The Deadline Plate. The villain does not
always need to invent a lie. Sometimes changing the record means
removing a name, shifting a date, preserving one account, or making
another impossible to find.
That is why the notebooks matter.
A notebook is limited. It cannot capture everything. The person
holding it must choose what to write down, which quotation is exact,
what needs verification, and which detail might matter later. Those
choices create responsibility. The notebook also leaves evidence of
uncertainty: crossed-out words, arrows, questions in the margin, and a
blank where the reporter did not hear clearly enough to pretend.
For young reporters, that can be an important lesson. Technology makes
documentation easier, but it does not make judgment automatic.
Nellie Bly was the right historical journalist for the first book
because she understood both evidence and access. Her reporting
mattered because she entered places powerful institutions preferred to
keep closed. She observed, remembered, questioned, and wrote for
readers who had not seen what she had seen.
Her work also creates difficult questions for a modern writer. How do you introduce a real
person without turning her into a marble statue? How do you respect
what she accomplished while still allowing fictional characters to
occupy the same room?
My answer was to make her active, intelligent, impatient, and human.
The students do not arrive to teach Nellie Bly how journalism works.
They are the ones trying to keep up.
The research moved between biographies, archival newspapers,
timelines, maps, and the practical details of a nineteenth-century
pressroom. I kept returning to the physical nature of news. Type had
weight. Ink stained hands. A printing plate could preserve a page, but
it could also be altered, hidden, or destroyed. That physicality gave
the fantasy rules something solid to push against.
It also changed how I thought about the students' modern newsroom.
Their digital stories feel temporary until one incomplete version
travels farther than the correction. Suddenly, the old problem and the
new problem look remarkably similar. Once a record begins moving, the
reporter cannot control every place it goes.
The students carry notebooks because they need tools that still work
when the spectacular tools fail. More importantly, they carry
notebooks because the series is about the choices made before
publication.
What did you see?
Who told you?
What can you verify?
What is missing?
Who pays the price if you get it wrong?
Those questions matter in 1887. They matter in a high school newsroom.
They matter anywhere history is still being written.
Eric Jourgensen
# # #
About the Author
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting